Methodology for ATM Benchmarking
RFC 3116
|
| Document |
Type |
|
RFC - Informational
(June 2001; No errata)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2013-03-02
|
|
Stream |
|
IETF
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
(None)
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
No shepherd assigned
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
RFC 3116 (Informational)
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
Network Working Group J. Dunn
Request for Comments: 3116 C. Martin
Category: Informational ANC, Inc.
June 2001
Methodology for ATM Benchmarking
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document discusses and defines a number of tests that may be
used to describe the performance characteristics of ATM (Asynchronous
Transfer Mode) based switching devices. In addition to defining the
tests this document also describes specific formats for reporting the
results of the tests.
This memo is a product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working Group
(BMWG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1. Test Device Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. Systems Under Test (SUTs). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3. Test Result Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.5. Test Configurations for SONET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.6. SUT Configuration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.7. Frame Formats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.8. Frame Sizes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.9. Verifying Received IP PDU's. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.10. Modifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.10.1. Management IP PDU's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.10.2. Routing Update IP PDU's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.11. Filters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.11.1. Filter Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.12. Protocol Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Dunn & Martin Informational [Page 1]
RFC 3116 Methodology for ATM Benchmarking June 2001
2.13. Route Set Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.14. Bidirectional Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.15. Single Stream Path. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.16. Multi-port. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.17. Multiple Protocols. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.18. Multiple IP PDU Sizes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.19. Testing Beyond a Single SUT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.20. Maximum IP PDU Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.21. Busty Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.22. Trial Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.23. Trial Duration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.24. Address Resolution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.25. Synchronized Payload Bit Pattern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.26. Burst Traffic Descriptors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3. Performance Metrics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1. Physical Layer-SONET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1.1. Pointer Movements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1.1.1. Pointer Movement Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1.1.2. Cell Loss due to Pointer Movement. . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.1.1.3. IP Packet Loss due to Pointer Movement . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.2. Transport Overhead (TOH) Error Count . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.2.1. TOH Error Propagation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.2.2. Cell Loss due to TOH Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.1.2.3. IP Packet Loss due to TOH Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.1.3. Path Overhead (POH) Error Count. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.1.3.1. POH Error Propagation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.1.3.2. Cell Loss due to POH Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.1.3.3. IP Packet Loss due to POH Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2. ATM Layer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1. Two-Point Cell Delay Variation (CDV) . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1.1. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1.2. Two-point CDV/Steady Load/One VCC. . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1.3. Two-point CDV/Steady Load/Twelve VCCs. . . . . . . . . . 28
Show full document text