On the Difference between Information Models and Data Models
RFC 3444
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
02 | (System) | Notify list changed from , to (None) |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Published as RFC 3444 |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Wijnen, Bert |
|
2003-01-17
|
02 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2002-11-13
|
02 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Hargest, Jacqueline |
|
2002-11-11
|
02 | Stephen Coya | State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent by Coya, Steve |
|
2002-11-07
|
02 | Stephen Coya | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Coya, Steve |
|
2002-10-31
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Document has now been reviewed by all IESG members who wanted to review and there are no objections for publication anymore. I (Bert) think that … Document has now been reviewed by all IESG members who wanted to review and there are no objections for publication anymore. I (Bert) think that it is now approved by IESG and so secretariat can send OK to RFC-Editor. |
|
2002-10-31
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Due date has been changed to 2002-10-31 from 2002-10-17 by Wijnen, Bert |
|
2002-10-31
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | Document has been reviewed by me (I asked for a defer on the 17th), and I am happy with it. Doc points out a need … Document has been reviewed by me (I asked for a defer on the 17th), and I am happy with it. Doc points out a need to specify how we deal with UML in the IETF. That's another action someone needs to take. |
|
2002-10-31
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | by Alvestrand, Harald |
|
2002-10-31
|
02 | (System) | IESG has approved the document |
|
2002-10-09
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Document has been reviewed by me and is OK. I have also done a pseudo WG Last Call on mibs mailing list, which did result … Document has been reviewed by me and is OK. I have also done a pseudo WG Last Call on mibs mailing list, which did result in some comments, but it did not result in any required changes. |
|
2002-10-09
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None |
|
2002-10-09
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Final AD Go-Ahead -- 0 from Publication Requested by bwijnen |
|
2002-10-07
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Publication as informational requested by NMRG chairs via RFC-Editor |
|
2002-10-07
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Draft Added by bwijnen |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt |
|
2002-09-10
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-01.txt |
|
2002-07-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-00.txt |