Mapping of Media Streams to Resource Reservation Flows
RFC 3524
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | By | Action |
|---|---|---|
|
2004-03-21
|
(System) | Last call text was added |
|
2004-03-21
|
Allison Mankin | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Allison Mankin |
|
2004-03-21
|
Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'This document received a Discuss from SMB for its weak Security Considerations (note it was not an old spec - per his observation). We … [Note]: 'This document received a Discuss from SMB for its weak Security Considerations (note it was not an old spec - per his observation). We fixed the problem with an RFC Editor note calling for S/MIME integrity when SDP in use by SIP: It is thus STRONGLY RECOMMENDED that integrity protection be applied to the SDP session descriptions. This is likely to be S/MIME over the SIP message carrying SDP as a body (RFC 3261). Other applications MAY use a different form of integrity protection. SMB removed his Discuss 2002-Dec-13 and the document will be announced approved.' has been cleared by Allison Mankin |
|
2004-03-21
|
Allison Mankin | RFC 3524, May 2003 |
|
2004-03-21
|
Allison Mankin | State Change Notice email list have been change to from , |
|
2003-04-28
|
(System) | RFC published |