Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 Certificates
RFC 3709
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
My DSICUSS question was: What do the numbers in the first column in appendix B represent? The answer is that they are offsets into the certificate. Russ and I agreed (via email) that it would be good to add a sentence about that so that people can understand what the first column represents.
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I have cleared my discuss based on version -12. I still agree with Ned's comments about describing data, but will leave it to Ned to say if those issues have been addressed. Still worried about the GIF reference, but it's not worth holding the document for.
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Changed my discuss vote to no-obj after discussion with Russ, Steve and others.
(Ned Freed; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I've cleared my discuss, but a couple of nits remain: The field name for the media type is called "mediaSubType". This should be changed to "mediaType" since it contains the entire media type string, not just the subtype. The restructuring that's been done fixes the problem of having to use image types exclusively for images and audio types exclusively for aduio, but this in turn means that the comment on the media type field "MIME image or audio subtype" is no longer appropriate. Suggest changing it to "MIME media type name and optional parameters". I continue to believe that it is a mistake not to use media features rather than inventing a new private nonextensible labelling scheme, but my belief is not cause to block this document going forward.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Recuse