Skip to main content

One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) Requirements
RFC 3763

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-05-06
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-05-06
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3763' added by Amy Vezza
2004-04-30
06 (System) RFC published
2004-02-11
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-02-11
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-02-11
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-02-11
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-02-11
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-02-11
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin
2004-02-11
06 Allison Mankin
[Note]: 'Returning document.  Important as guides main protocol of WG.  Now has strong mandatory to implement security and supports timestamp encryption - on agenda  for …
[Note]: 'Returning document.  Important as guides main protocol of WG.  Now has strong mandatory to implement security and supports timestamp encryption - on agenda  for SMB to check against his pseudo-discuss.
' has been cleared by Allison Mankin
2004-02-11
06 Allison Mankin State Change Notice email list have been change to , from ,
2004-02-11
06 Allison Mankin
[Note]: 'Returning document.  Important as guides main protocol of WG.  Now has strong mandatory to implement security and supports timestamp encryption - on agenda  for …
[Note]: 'Returning document.  Important as guides main protocol of WG.  Now has strong mandatory to implement security and supports timestamp encryption - on agenda  for SMB to check against his pseudo-discuss.
' added by Allison Mankin
2003-07-10
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation  :: AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Vezza, Amy
2003-07-03
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation  :: AD Followup by Mankin, Allison
2003-06-22
06 Allison Mankin -06 has strong mandatory to implement security and supports timestamp encryption - waiting now  for SMB to check.
2003-06-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-06.txt
2003-03-05
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation  :: AD Followup from AD Evaluation by Mankin, Allison
2003-03-04
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-05.txt
2003-03-02
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by Mankin, Allison
2003-03-02
06 Allison Mankin Received note from author on WG list 2003-Feb-28.  Fix does not address timestamp points in SMB comments.  Discussing fix with SMB.
2002-12-01
06 Allison Mankin Sent note to WG with SMB comment
2002-12-01
06 Allison Mankin
Pseudo-Discuss by SMB from 2002-Oct-03 (since Secretariat did not enter):

  What are the effects on the measurement if an unencrypted (and,
  presumably, unauthenticated) …
Pseudo-Discuss by SMB from 2002-Oct-03 (since Secretariat did not enter):

  What are the effects on the measurement if an unencrypted (and,
  presumably, unauthenticated) timestamp is modified?  They seem to
  have a strong preference for leaving them in the clear.  It may not
  be a solvable problem, given their other constraints, but they should
  document the tradeoff.

  Still looks vulnerable to replays.  They mention the word "replay",
  but say nothing about what to do.  Timestamps are one traditional
  mechanism -- but not if they're unprotected...

  For the replay issue, what I'm asking for is a section analogous
  to 6.3, 6.4, etc., explaining the problem and giving the constraints
  on possible solutions (such as not using unprotected timestamps).
2002-10-08
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation  -- New ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by mankin
2002-10-08
06 Allison Mankin On 2002-10-03 IESG, it got security review and now needs new rev (also had some comments from ops [note from Allison]
2002-10-08
06 Allison Mankin by mankin
2002-09-20
06 Allison Mankin Requested to be on 2002-10-03 IESG agenda, after
checking back because original request of
PS was an error.  Document is in good shape
otherwise.
2002-09-20
06 Allison Mankin A new comment added
by mankin
2002-09-20
06 Allison Mankin responsible has been changed to mankin from Unassigned
2002-09-20
06 Allison Mankin Intended Status has been changed to Informational from Proposed Standard
2002-09-20
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Pre AD Evaluation by mankin
2002-09-16
06 Jacqueline Hargest Draft Added by jhargest
2002-08-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-04.txt
2002-08-16
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-03.txt
2002-07-02
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-02.txt
2001-11-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-01.txt
2001-07-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-reqs-00.txt