Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Margaret Cullen) Yes

(Thomas Narten) Yes

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

The security terminology could be a bit clearer, but I'm not going to worry.  That said, if the document goes back for any more work, I'll supply some new text.

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

  My original comment was: please explain "secure transmission" in section 3.5.
  
  It looks like section 3.5 has been renumbered, and it is now section 3.6.
  The section now talks about authentication, which is good.  I believe that
  integrity protection is necessary.  I am not sure if confidentiality is
  also needed.

(David Kessens) No Objection