The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
RFC 3782
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) Yes
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) Yes
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) Yes
(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) Yes
It might be good to make another pass over the abstract, which reads a bit odd towards the end. I.e., it talks about the RFC that is being replaced rather than about the new document.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
- I believe we normally want the ABSTRACT to state that this document obsoletes RFC 2582. - I believe that section 11 addresses Harald's discuss, does it not?
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Missed section 11 in my initial read-through (or did not remember that the change material was in 2 places). Apologies.
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection
Nits: References in abstract, no copyright or IPR boilerplate
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Remove references from the Abstract.
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection