The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
RFC 3782
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020-01-21
|
02 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag) |
|
2012-08-22
|
02 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand |
|
2004-04-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 3782' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-04-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-04-26
|
02 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2004-01-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-01-26
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2004-01-26
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2004-01-26
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-01-23
|
02 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-01-22 |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] It might be good to make another pass over the abstract, which reads a bit odd towards the end. I.e., it talks about … [Ballot comment] It might be good to make another pass over the abstract, which reads a bit odd towards the end. I.e., it talks about the RFC that is being replaced rather than about the new document. |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Missed section 11 in my initial read-through (or did not remember that the change material was in 2 places). Apologies. |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
|
2004-01-22
|
02 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] - I believe we normally want the ABSTRACT to state that this document obsoletes RFC 2582. - I believe that section … [Ballot comment] - I believe we normally want the ABSTRACT to state that this document obsoletes RFC 2582. - I believe that section 11 addresses Harald's discuss, does it not? |
|
2004-01-21
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2004-01-20
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Remove references from the Abstract. |
|
2004-01-20
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
|
2004-01-20
|
02 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-01-20
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2004-01-18
|
02 | Ned Freed | [Ballot comment] Nits: References in abstract, no copyright or IPR boilerplate |
|
2004-01-18
|
02 | Ned Freed | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ned Freed by Ned Freed |
|
2004-01-16
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot discuss] Formality discuss: The "Changes from RFC 2582" section should be moved out of the "Note to RFC Editor (to be deleted)" section … [Ballot discuss] Formality discuss: The "Changes from RFC 2582" section should be moved out of the "Note to RFC Editor (to be deleted)" section and preserved in the RFC. Change logs are important, especially for people who want to update their implementation. |
|
2004-01-16
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | Jon Peterson | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-01-22 by Jon Peterson |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | Jon Peterson | Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | Jon Peterson | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2004-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2004-01-06
|
02 | Jon Peterson | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson |
|
2003-11-21
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-newreno-02.txt |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Jon Peterson | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Jon Peterson |
|
2003-10-28
|
02 | Jon Peterson | Draft Added by Jon Peterson |
|
2003-10-02
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-newreno-01.txt |
|
2003-06-20
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-newreno-00.txt |