Introduction to the Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards Track and Experimental Documents
RFC 3789

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ned Freed
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2004-06-15
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-06-15
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3789
' added by Amy Vezza
2004-06-09
06 (System) RFC published
2004-01-12
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-01-12
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-01-12
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-01-12
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-01-09
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-01-09 from 2003-12-10
2004-01-09
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-05
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
The -04 version of the apps doc addresses the specific concerns I had with it.
I think the document should go out.
2003-12-24
06 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ned Freed has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ned Freed
2003-12-23
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2003-12-22
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-06.txt
2003-12-18
06 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-18 by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
I have completed a careful reading of this and I think it did a good job.  I appreciate the excellent response to ...
2003-12-18
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2003-12-18
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Allison Mankin
2003-12-18
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Thomas Narten
2003-12-18
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Bill Fenner
2003-12-18
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-05:

  In section 1.1, 4th paragraph: s/robudt/robust/

  In section 1.1, 7th paragraph, the document says: 'To do ...
2003-12-18
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-sec-03:

  In Section 5.051, there is a problem.  RFC 3280 (and RFC 2459 before it)
  accommodate IPv4 and IPv6 ...
2003-12-18
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Russ Housley
2003-12-18
06 Alex Zinin
[Ballot comment]
Checked the routing doc. There has been a discussion on this doc on the routing area mailing list and the rev seems to ...
2003-12-18
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Alex Zinin
2003-12-17
06 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
The Internet document says:

"3.1 RFC 791 Internet Protocol

  This specification defines IPv4 and is replaced by the IPv6
  specifications ...
2003-12-17
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-16
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
I have only reviewed the security document.  It looks pretty good, but Section 7 doesn't mention 2514.  As far as ...
2003-12-16
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-12
06 Ned Freed
[Ballot discuss]
Minor omission: RFC 2192, IMAP URLs, is dependent on RFC 1738 URL
definitions. This should be noted as was done for RFC 2193 ...
2003-12-12
06 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Ned Freed
2003-12-11
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
I have only scanned the apps document. There are some inconsistencies - for instance, TIP (RFC 2371) has v4 dependencies, but is not mentioned ...
2003-12-11
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Harald Alvestrand
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-12-18 by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen Created "Approve" ballot
2003-12-11
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-12-11
06 (System) Last call text was added
2003-12-11
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2003-12-10 from
2003-12-11
06 Bert Wijnen State Change Notice email list have been change to <pekkas@netcore.fi>, <Jonne.Soininen@nokia.com>,<bob@thefinks.com> from
2003-12-04
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2003-12-01
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-05.txt
2003-10-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-04.txt
2003-09-02
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-03.txt
2003-08-22
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-02.txt
2003-07-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
2003-02-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-00.txt