MIME Type Registrations for 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Multimedia files
RFC 3839

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) (was No Record, No Objection) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-28)
No email
send info
Sections 3 uses "RFC XXXX" to refer to what seems to be the eventual RFC number for this document.  That's a bit confusing at first read -- I can't tell if the authors mean "this document", or some other RFC.  I think it would be clearer to say "see the Security Considerations (section 2) in RFC XXXX" in section 3, add a short RFC Editor note right there in section 3 (not section 5), and text should be added to the IANA Considerations section to let IANA know that the RFC number needed in section 3 is the one for this document.  Perhaps the text from section 5 could be moved to section 4 to make it obvious for the IANA.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-28)
No email
send info
  Copyright has wrong year.

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-28)
No email
send info
No further objection, but let me say I strongly support Ted's comment. There are already serious interoperability problems in the field with incompatible codecs for 'voice clips' and so on in the MMS world. Having something at the MIME header level for this would be very valuable.

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection