Skip to main content

IETF Problem Resolution Process
RFC 3844

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from mshore@cisco.com, avri@acm.org to (None)
2004-08-31
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-08-31
04 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3844
' added by Amy Vezza
2004-08-27
04 (System) RFC published
2004-04-29
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-04-28
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-04-28
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-04-28
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-04-27
04 Harald Alvestrand State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-27
04 Harald Alvestrand
RFC Editor note added to writeup:

Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4.

  Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/

  Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- …
RFC Editor note added to writeup:

Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4.

  Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/

  Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/

  Section 7: s/security- related/security-related/
2004-04-16
04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15
2004-04-15
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-15
04 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-04-15
04 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-04-15
04 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-15
04 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
Although I wrote large parts of this document (and have therefore recused myself from the ballot), I do wonder about the utility of …
[Ballot comment]
Although I wrote large parts of this document (and have therefore recused myself from the ballot), I do wonder about the utility of publishing this document, as we never acheived WG consensus on the contents...
2004-04-14
04 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-04-14
04 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-04-14
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4.

  Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/

  Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/

  Section 7: …
[Ballot comment]
Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4.

  Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/

  Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/

  Section 7: s/security- related/security-related/

  I would like to see Section 7 point out that improved cooperation between
  WGs and across areas could lead to improved security in IETF standards.
2004-04-14
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-04-13
04 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-04-05
04 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from Waiting for Writeup by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand Ballot has been issued by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-05
04 Harald Alvestrand Created "Approve" ballot
2004-01-28
04 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-01-14
04 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-01-14
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-01-14
04 Harald Alvestrand Last Call was requested by Harald Alvestrand
2004-01-14
04 Harald Alvestrand State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Harald Alvestrand
2004-01-14
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-01-14
04 (System) Last call text was added
2004-01-14
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-01-14
04 Harald Alvestrand State Change Notice email list have been change to mshore@cisco.com, avri@acm.org from
2004-01-14
04 Harald Alvestrand
Note from the WG Chairs:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt
has completed WG last call and is ready for review by the IESG for publication as an informational RFC. …
Note from the WG Chairs:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt
has completed WG last call and is ready for review by the IESG for publication as an informational RFC.

There were several strong objections to publication of the draft, but not sufficient, in our opinion, to overcome the broader agreement within the working group.  The objections were: 1) the document is not
comprehensive (i.e. does not include all of the comments that were received on it, and 2) the document does not reflect the consensus of the working group.  However, because we agreed at the time the working
group was getting started that the documents could not be comprehensive, because the concern about consensus on document contents reflects a misunderstanding about the intention of the document, and because there was otherwise agreement about publishing the document, we felt the issues raised were not sufficient to block forwarding the document to the IESG for review.

Because the document does have implications for the entire organization and because it is contentious, we would like to request IETF last call, as well.

Melinda
2004-01-14
04 Harald Alvestrand Draft Added by Harald Alvestrand
2004-01-12
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt
2003-11-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-03.txt
2003-09-02
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-02.txt
2003-07-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-01.txt
2003-05-12
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-00.txt