Skip to main content

Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Certificate Handling
RFC 3850

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from turners@ieca.com, blake@sendmail.com to turners@ieca.com
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Scott Hollenbeck
2009-05-27
(System)
2009-05-18
(System)
2008-10-30
(System)
Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4346, RFC 5246, RFC 5289, RFC 4492, RFC 2409, …
Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4346, RFC 5246, RFC 5289, RFC 4492, RFC 2409, RFC 4306, RFC 4754, RFC 4753, RFC 4869, RFC 4253, RFC 2633, RFC 3278, RFC 4347, RFC 4366, RFC 4109, RFC 4252, RFC 3850, RFC 3851, RFC 5008, draft-ietf-tls-rfc43...
2004-07-23
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-07-23
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3850' added by Amy Vezza
2004-07-21
07 (System) RFC published
2004-06-15
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-06-14
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-06-14
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-06-14
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-06-11
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10
2004-06-10
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-10
07 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Amy Vezza
2004-06-10
07 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-06-10
07 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-06-10
07 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-06-10
07 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-06-10
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot comment]
No IPR section. I assume RFC-Editor will add it.
2004-06-10
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-10
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot comment]
No IPR section
2004-06-10
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-10
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-10
07 Jon Peterson
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3 (2nd paragraph), I'm a little confused by the text that says receiving implementations MUST "recognize and accept" certificates that contain …
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3 (2nd paragraph), I'm a little confused by the text that says receiving implementations MUST "recognize and accept" certificates that contain no email address. What asssurance are such certificates providing in the mail context? How are they processed? Given the importance placed on matching the subjectAltName with the From header field of an email in later paragraphs, I found the lack of procedures for this case a little odd.
2004-06-10
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-06-10
07 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-06-09
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot comment]
-
2004-06-09
07 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-08
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-06-08
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-08
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot comment]
Does Section 3, which among other things talks about comparing email addresses, raise any internationalization issues?
2004-06-08
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-08
07 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot discuss]
This document uses ASN.1 data structures (such as SEQUENCE in section 3, CHOICE in section 4.4.3) to describe MUSTs, but it doesn't include …
[Ballot discuss]
This document uses ASN.1 data structures (such as SEQUENCE in section 3, CHOICE in section 4.4.3) to describe MUSTs, but it doesn't include a normative reference to ITU-T X.208.
2004-06-08
07 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
"BER" and "DER" are included in the list of definitions in section 1.1, but they're not used anywhere in the document that I …
[Ballot comment]
"BER" and "DER" are included in the list of definitions in section 1.1, but they're not used anywhere in the document that I could find.  They should probably be removed.
2004-06-08
07 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot discuss]
This document uses ASN.1 data structures (such as SEQUENCE in section 3, CHOICE in section 4.4.3) to describe MUSTs, but it doesn't include …
[Ballot discuss]
This document uses ASN.1 data structures (such as SEQUENCE in section 3, CHOICE in section 4.4.3) to describe MUSTs, but it doesn't include a normative references to ITU-T X.208.
2004-06-08
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-08
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2004-06-08
07 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2004-06-08
07 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2004-06-04
07 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Russ Housley
2004-06-04
07 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2004-06-04
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-07.txt
2004-06-02
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2004-05-21
07 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call Comments:
We understand there to be no IANA Actions.
2004-05-19
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-05-19
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-05-19
07 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2004-05-19
07 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2004-05-19
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-05-19
07 (System) Last call text was added
2004-05-19
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-05-19
07 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley
2004-05-10
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-06.txt
2004-02-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt
2003-10-27
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-04.txt
2003-02-20
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-03.txt
2002-11-04
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-02.txt
2002-07-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-01.txt
2002-02-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-00.txt