Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Authenticated Identity Body (AIB) Format
RFC 3893

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2003-12-18 for -)
No email
send info
No Further objections or comments

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2003-12-18)
No email
send info
Shepherding AD understands problem. I expect to have no problem clearing the DISCUSS when new text arrives.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2003-12-12 for -)
No email
send info
No IPR boilerplate

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2003-12-16 for -)
No email
send info

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2003-12-16 for -)
No email
send info
I found this text a little unclear:

>  Unsigned AIBs MUST NOT be honored by any recipients.

I'd suggest changing it to say that Unsigned AIBs should be treated according
to the rules set out in Section 7 for AIBs that do not validate; if that doesn't make
sense, then some clarifying text that explains what "MUST NOT be honored" will
imply (identity not displayed?  message discarded?)

In this text:

>   Note that this means that the recipients of the
 >  request, even if they are unable to inspect the AIBF, will still be
  > able to see who signed that body (although it will not necessarily be
  > obvious that the body contains an AIB).

Does it really mean "inspect the AIB Format" or "inspect the AIB?"

An example showing multiple AIBs (Section 4.) would be valuable, I believe.

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) (was Abstain) Recuse

Recuse ( for -)
No email
send info