Open Pluggable Edge Services (OPES) Treatment of IAB Considerations
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Ned Freed) Yes
(Allison Mankin) Yes
(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection
Comment (2004-02-17 for -)
Comment from Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART: If this draft needs to be published as an RFC (why? especially since it has normative references that will prevent its publication until OPES is finished anyway), it's close to OK to publish. I have two comments: - Section 3 on "one-party consent" seems unresponsive to the IAB concern. The authors can identify situations where one-party consent isn't reasonable or practical, but don't name situations where one-party consent DOES make sense. The rest of the sections seemed like the WG "gets it". This section does not. - The last paragraph in Section 5.1 was unclear to me. It might help if the two entities named were not the Cable Company ISP and the Cable Company, but it took about four reads before I could even start to guess what this example had to do with notifications vs trace.
(Steven Bellovin) No Objection
Comment (2004-02-03 for -)
I would like to hear the IAB's opinion of this document.
(Margaret Cullen) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection