Skip to main content

Alternative Decision Making Processes for Consensus-Blocked Decisions in the IETF
RFC 3929

Yes


No Objection

(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)

Recuse

(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2004-07-21)
Reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART
He thinks it is overly prescriptive, and that he won't use it, but sees no harm from publishing it.

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-07-22)
I'd like the writeup to remind the community that there was a Last Call.  I think this
has been well-written to give people a thoughtful experiment.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-07-22)
There is a weird formatting thing with the 2nd one of the normative references.
The one with the 53 extra chars over 72 below is the result

idnits 1.33 (09 Jul 2004)
  There are 4 instances of too long lines in the document,
  -- the longest one being 53 characters in excess of 72.
  There are 14 instances of lines with control characters in the document.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse ()