Skip to main content

Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export Version 9
RFC 3954

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)

No Objection

(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-01-08)
I think we should not lose sight of the goal here.  Netflow has a ton of flaws, that's 
why the IPFIX WG exists.  But it is probably useful for there to be a spec of netflow 
for the community.  I  suggest that this spec get published promptly with a note on it:

This documents the original protocol.  The IETF IPFIX WG is developing a
new protocol meeting the same requirements, but also built with security and 
inherent congestion aware transport.

We should give clarity suggestions, but not ask the authors to make technical changes...

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-01-03)
I would have expected the risks of exposure of flow information to at least
be mentioned in the security considerations section. We're talking about
traffic analysis here, after all. Perhaps a reference to the discussion
of these isssues in draft-ietf-ipfix-reqs-12.txt is in order?

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()