Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
RFC 3973

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Alex Zinin) Yes

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-20 for -)
No email
send info
Since when is set union non-commutativ (section 2.2)?  If it is non-commutative here, it shouldn't be called set union, or the reason for the difference should be explained.

The IPsec section of the security considerations is quite vague; it doesn't really say what has to be supported.  It also doesn't take msec into account.

(Ned Freed) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-18 for -)
No email
send info
Nits: No copyright or IPR boilerplate, references need separating

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-20 for -)
No email
send info
From OPS Directorate (Pekka):

One question/comment:

6.  IANA Considerations
6.1.  PIM Address Family
6.2.  PIM Hello Options

==> this specification defines PIM AF/Hello options which affect all
the PIM protocols (including PIM-SM). Is this the appropriate place to
do so (at least, if it is, I guess it should be explicitly called out
in the section, and noted in the other PIM specs as well..)?  At
least, the PIM-SM revised spec includes about the same text again --
you can't do the allocations twice, at least.. :-)

nits:
 - split refs
 - add ipr etc. sections