RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
RFC 3984

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

Comment (2004-12-16)
No email
send info
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART
His review:

Draft looks in good shape, no major nits.  The document is fairly dense, especially for a non-payload guy, but this seems like a reasonable specification.

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

Comment (2004-12-13)
No email
send info
I agree with Allison's note in the MIME-type review request [1].  The change controller should be the IESG.  Please add an RFC Editor note to make this correction.


(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

Comment (2004-12-15)
No email
send info
*** matchref -- match citations and references.
    Input file: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-h264-11.txt
!! Missing citation for Informative reference:
  P073 L038:     [11] P. Borgwardt, "Handling Interlaced Video in H.26L", VCEG-

!! Missing citation for Normative reference:
  P073 L021:     [7]  ITU-T Recommendation T.35, "Procedure for the allocation of

(Alex Zinin) No Objection