Skip to main content

Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses
RFC 4001

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-05-26)
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-05-06)
Is this supposed to update or obsolete RFC 2851?  It includes a section describing changes from 2851, but doesn't say anywhere if 2851 is being updated or obsoleted.  It _does_ say that 3291 is being obsoleted in the document header, though, so it should probably say something similar for 2851.

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()