Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points
RFC 4020

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

(Bill Fenner) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

Comment (2004-09-27)
No email
send info
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART

His review:

This document seems like a reasonable contribution to the IETF and is
ready for publication.

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

Comment (2004-09-27)
No email
send info
>    To break the deadlock, "pre-RFC" implementations simply choose some
>    code points; these may turn out to be different from those later

suggested reword:

   To break the deadlock, "pre-RFC" implementations have sometimes
   simply choosen some "seemingly unused" code points;

I.e., we don't want to suggest that it is OK to choose...

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) Abstain