Scenarios and Analysis for Introducing IPv6 into ISP Networks
RFC 4029

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2005-03-26
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-03-26
03 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4029' added by Amy Vezza
2005-03-18
03 (System) RFC published
2004-08-17
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-08-16
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-08-16
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-08-16
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-13
03 David Kessens State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by David Kessens
2004-06-21
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-06-18
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-03.txt
2004-05-28
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27
2004-05-27
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss]
One of the reasons for doing the scenario analysis is to indentify
holes in our transition mechanisms, i.e., to identify follow-on
work ...
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
03 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-05-27
03 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
>    Large end sites are usually running managed network. 

doesn't parse.

>    Even though the RIR policies on getting ...
2004-05-27
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-27
03 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
Reference
  [BCP38UPD]      F. Baker, P. Savola "Ingress Filtering for
                  Multihomed ...
2004-05-27
03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-26
03 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mark Allman, Gen-ART

This document is mostly fine to publish as an informational RFC.

  + It could really use a pass ...
2004-05-26
03 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-05-26
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Russ Housley
2004-05-26
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
In section 1.1: s/present document/document/

  Please expand "IX", "DS", and "ACLs" the first time they are used.

  I ...
2004-05-26
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-05-25
03 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
The document doesn't discuss provisioning at all.  I'm willing to be told that that's out of scope, but billing ...
2004-05-25
03 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
The document doesn't discuss provisioning at all.  I'm willing to be told that that's out of scope, but billing ...
2004-05-25
03 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-25
03 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
The document doesn't discuss provisioning at all.  I'm willing to be told that that's out of scope, but billing ...
2004-05-25
03 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-25
03 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
Section 7 suggests that the ISP may transition to IPv6 only networks in some
parts of its network.  I believe the draft-dnsop-IPv6-transport-guidelines ...
2004-05-25
03 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-05-24
03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-22
03 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27 by David Kessens
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Kessens
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens Ballot has been issued by David Kessens
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens Created "Approve" ballot
2004-05-20
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-05-20
03 (System) Last call text was added
2004-05-20
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-05-20
03 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27 by Amy Vezza
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27 by David Kessens
2004-05-20
03 David Kessens State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by David Kessens
2004-04-29
03 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2004-04-21
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-02.txt
2004-02-05
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt
2003-12-05
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-00.txt