RTP Payload Formats for European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) European Standard ES 202 050, ES 202 211, and ES 202 212 Distributed Speech Recognition Encoding
RFC 4060

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-09-16)
No email
send info
Reviewed by Joel Halpern, Gen-ART

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-09-16)
No email
send info
Is congestion control a security consideration?

Also, when I read the 2nd paragraph of the Sec Cons, I was tempted to read it as a MUST-use for DCCP, or something like that. While I agree with the spirit of the statement, neither 3550 nor 3551 offer much by way of normative MUSTs for congestion control implementation. So, I'm not exactly sure what measures the authors intend to be adopted here at MUST-strength.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-09-10)
No email
send info
MIME type review request was sent on Mon Aug 9 2004.

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info