OSPF Benchmarking Terminology and Concepts
RFC 4062
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection
These documents were reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART. They have not been checked against the ID-NITS list. No table of contents, no copyright boilerplate. MUST NOT used without definition. Minor errors in English. No Security Considerations section. Note on "applicability": Despite the word "applicability" in the title, this is not an Applicability Statement in the IETF sense. The IESG needs to be sure it doesn't have a problem with that. It's really a set of health warnings about the following document. It does therefore need to be published at the same time. The -intraarea- document treats IPv6 as a "poor cousin". It should say that it's equally applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 (unless it is not). The reason this is a Comment and not a Discuss is that others hold the token for getting the security sections right. The rest should be fixed at the same time.
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
<Changed comment to DISCUSS...>
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection