Considerations When Using Basic OSPF Convergence Benchmarks
RFC 4063
Yes
(David Kessens)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
David Kessens Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-01)
Unknown
These documents were reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART. They have not been checked against the ID-NITS list. No table of contents, no copyright boilerplate. MUST NOT used without definition. Minor errors in English. No Security Considerations section. Note on "applicability": Despite the word "applicability" in the title, this is not an Applicability Statement in the IETF sense. The IESG needs to be sure it doesn't have a problem with that. It's really a set of health warnings about the following document. It does therefore need to be published at the same time. The -intraarea- document treats IPv6 as a "poor cousin". It should say that it's equally applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 (unless it is not). The reason this is a Comment and not a Discuss is that others hold the token for getting the security sections right. The rest should be fixed at the same time.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-03-30)
Unknown
<Changed comment to DISCUSS...>
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown