Skip to main content

Instructions for Seamoby and Experimental Mobility Protocol IANA Allocations
RFC 4065

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
02 (System) Notify list changed from pcalhoun@airespace.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com to (None)
2005-07-13
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-07-13
02 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4065' added by Amy Vezza
2005-07-08
02 (System) RFC published
2004-10-04
02 Allison Mankin State Change Notice email list have been change to pcalhoun@airespace.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com from pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com
2004-09-23
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-09-21
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-09-21
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-09-21
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-09-21
02 Allison Mankin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Allison Mankin
2004-07-14
02 Allison Mankin Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin
2004-07-14
02 Allison Mankin
Sent James RFC Editor notes after waiting to see issues from iesg review/re-review of card/ctp.

1. Change the shared SCTP port for CARD and CTP, …
Sent James RFC Editor notes after waiting to see issues from iesg review/re-review of card/ctp.

1. Change the shared SCTP port for CARD and CTP, to one each, and
  have them not use PPI's.  The IESG has actually preferred to encourage
  that SCTP not substitute PPIs for ports, and SCTP ports are not scarce.
  We missed this point earlier.

  The text changes for this are (I'll put them in RFC Editor notes on the
  announcement, no revision needed):

  OLD:

    2.0    Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations

    IANA SHALL assign SCTP port number TBD1 for use by experimental mobility
    protocols such as Seamoby. See Section 5.2.1 of [CARD] for a description of
    inter-access router CARD protocol use of SCTP, and Section 3.1 of [CTP] for
    a description of the inter-access router CTP use of SCTP.

    IANA SHALL assign SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier (PPI) TBD2, designated
    "CTP", for the Context Transfer Protocol, and SCTP Payload Protocol
    Identifier TBD3, designated "CARD", for the Candidate Access Router
    Discovery protocol. These are used to differentiate inter-router CARD and
    CTP messages on the SCTP port. The allocation policy for new PPI numbers is
    the method of IETF Consensus Action.


  NEW:

  2.0    Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations


    IANA SHALL assign SCTP port numbers TBD1 for use by [CARD] and TBD1a for use
    by [CTP].  See Section 5.2.1 of [CARD] for a description of
    inter-access router CARD protocol use of SCTP, and Section 3.1 of [CTP] for
    a description of the inter-access router CTP use of SCTP.


  OLD:

  9.0    Utilization by Other Experimental Mobility Protocols

    The ICMP Experimental Mobility type code and SCTP port are available for
    other experimental mobility protocols to utilize. Other experimental
    mobility protocols MAY define additional ICMP messages that utilize the code
    points under the Experimental Mobility ICMP type, and MAY define protocols
    that utilize additional SCTP PPI numbers for the Experimental Mobility
    protocol por

  9.0    Utilization by Other Experimental Mobility Protocols

    The ICMP Experimental Mobility type code is available for
    other experimental mobility protocols to utilize. Other experimental
    mobility protocols MAY define additional ICMP messages that utilize the code
    points under the Experimental Mobility ICMP type.


2. There's an RFC 2434 mistake, a category that doesn't exist.  The only
  way to guarantee IESG review is the IETF Consensus category; this requires
  an RFC publication and an IESG review.  Text change:

  OLD:

    Subsequent allocations of subtype codes SHALL be done by the method of
    Specification Required and IESG Review as defined in RFC 2434.

  NEW:

    Subsequent allocations of subtype codes SHALL be done by the method of
    IETF Consensus as defined in RFC 2434.
2004-06-25
02 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-24
2004-06-24
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-24
02 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
>    2.0    Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations
>     
>      IANA SHALL assign SCTP port number TBD1 for …
[Ballot comment]
>    2.0    Common IPv4 and IPv6 Allocations
>     
>      IANA SHALL assign SCTP port number TBD1 for use by experimental mobility
>      protocols such as Seamoby. See Section 5.2.1 of [CARD] for a description of

resusing the port  for multiple applications seems not so good. Why
not just assign a port number for CARD and be done with it?

>      Specification Required and IESG Review as defined in RFC 2434.
>     

IESG Review is not defined in 2434...
2004-06-24
02 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-06-24
02 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-24
02 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-06-23
02 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-06-23
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-06-23
02 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART.

Comment worth pulling into ballot:

5.2 - Given that the registry is starting with 8 values, and this …
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART.

Comment worth pulling into ballot:

5.2 - Given that the registry is starting with 8 values, and this is
just from IEEE 802, I'm wondering if one byte (255 values) leaves
enough headroom for the next 20 years. I guess it's BARELY big enough.
Yeah, Seamoby is Experimental, but what if the experiment works?

But John Loughney responded (on the gen-art list):

Strong guidence from the AD & Thomas Narten suggested that this space
be left small intentially to avoid potential over extension.  However,
if the experiment works, then the document will be reved as proposed
standard with this fixed, if needed.
2004-06-23
02 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART.

Comment worth pulling into ballot:

5.2 - Given that the registry is starting with 8 values, and this …
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART.

Comment worth pulling into ballot:

5.2 - Given that the registry is starting with 8 values, and this is
just from IEEE 802, I'm wondering if one byte (255 values) leaves
enough headroom for the next 20 years. I guess it's BARELY big enough.
Yeah, Seamoby is Experimental, but what if the experiment works?
2004-06-23
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-06-18
02 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'Supports CTP (new on this agenda), CARD (IESG already reviewed).
Blue Team
' added by Allison Mankin
2004-06-18
02 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-18
02 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
It might be helpful if section 12 (IANA Considerations) spelled out the TBD actions that are sprinkled throughout the document instead of just …
[Ballot comment]
It might be helpful if section 12 (IANA Considerations) spelled out the TBD actions that are sprinkled throughout the document instead of just saying that "This entire document is about IANA considerations".  It's easy to miss an action given the way the document is currently written.
2004-06-18
02 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin Created "Approve" ballot
2004-06-17
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-06-17
02 (System) Last call text was added
2004-06-17
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-24 by Allison Mankin
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'Supports CTP (new on this agenda), CARD (returning).' added by Allison Mankin
2004-06-17
02 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin
2004-06-09
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-06-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-iana-02.txt
2004-05-28
02 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin
2004-05-28
02 Allison Mankin State Change Notice email list have been change to pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com from pcalhoun@diameter.org, pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com
2004-05-28
02 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2004-05-21
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-iana-01.txt
2004-05-14
02 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2004-05-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-iana-00.txt