Randomness Requirements for Security
RFC 4086
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes
Very useful and nicely written document.
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection
Reviewed by Elwyn Davies, Gen-ART The review is entered into the comment log; there are a number of suggestions for clarification that should be heeded if the document is respun, but they are not show-stoppers.
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
Typos (non-ascii character conversion) in section 5: s/All that?Ç–s needed/All that is needed/ s/system?Ç–s/system's/ 5.2.2: s/1?Ç–s and 0?Ç–s/1's and 0's/ 5.4: s/xor?Ç–ing/xor'ing/ and in other places.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection
(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection