Randomness Requirements for Security
RFC 4086

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2005-02-03)
No email
send info
Very useful and nicely written document.

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-02-03)
No email
send info
Reviewed by Elwyn Davies, Gen-ART

The review is entered into the comment log; there are a number of suggestions for clarification that should be heeded if the document is respun, but they are not show-stoppers.

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-09-07 for -)
No email
send info
Typos (non-ascii character conversion) in section 5:
s/All that?Ç–s needed/All that is needed/
s/system?Ç–s/system's/

5.2.2: s/1?Ç–s and 0?Ç–s/1's and 0's/

5.4: s/xor?Ç–ing/xor'ing/

and in other places.

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info