Usage of the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Alternative Network Address Types (ANAT) Semantics in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 4092

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin) Yes

(Jon Peterson) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

Comment (2004-07-20)
No email
send info
As noted in the mmusic ANAT draft, I have some misgivings about ANAT in
general.  But if it is going to be supported, then this mechanism is needed.
That is why I am not objecting to this one, where I would like to further discuss
the basic idea.

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

Comment (2004-07-16)
No email
send info
An appropriate S/MIME reference would be helpful in section 6, where the document says "The natural choice to integrity protect header fields in SIP is S/MIME".

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection