Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the Control Plane
RFC 4098
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
06 | (System) | Notify list changed from <kdubray@juniper.net>, <acmorton@att.com> to <kdubray@juniper.net> |
|
2005-06-10
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-06-10
|
06 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 4098' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-06-06
|
06 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2004-11-04
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-11-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2004-11-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2004-11-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-10-25
|
06 | David Kessens | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by David Kessens |
|
2004-10-25
|
06 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Kessens |
|
2004-10-13
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot comment] - |
|
2004-07-21
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-06.txt |
|
2004-04-03
|
06 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 |
|
2004-04-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-04-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-04-02
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2004-04-02
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2004-04-02
|
06 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
|
2004-04-01
|
06 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2004-04-01
|
06 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Lucy Lynch, Gen-ART This document does not use 2119 language. There are places where the word "should" is used, but in … [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Lucy Lynch, Gen-ART This document does not use 2119 language. There are places where the word "should" is used, but in the context, one would think that the meaning of 2119 "MUST" is the intended reading. Still, the doc seems good. Some more nits in the review (spelling sized). |
|
2004-04-01
|
06 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2004-03-30
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2004-03-30
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Ted Hardie |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total … [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total available in the address field, used to define the network prefix. I hate to nit-pick definitions in a terminology documents, but I had to read this over and over before I could make this mean what I think they mean. I take it they mean the network prefix length describes the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field; the placement of "total available" in the above makes that hard to infer. Would "The network prefix length contains the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field" make sense as a replacement? NIT: DUT is first expanded as "Cevice Under Test" NIT: Thus they will forward every packet to a specific next hop based on the longest match between the destination IP addresse and the routes in the forwarding table. -->IP address A quiet rant on section 4.1.3: (No change needed, but this does work my nerves enough that it ought to be fed back to the authors) A full default free table is the union of all sets of default free BGP routes collectively announced by the complete set of autonomous systems making up the public Internet. Due to the dynamic nature of the Internet, the exact size and composition of this table may vary slightly depending where and when it is observed. While I am sure that the authors understand far better than I do how path-vector protocols work, I am concerned that the use of this phrase without comment may reinforce a common misunderstanding. Folks new to this (and even some folks with considerable operational experience) often use phrases like this in ways which elide the critical fact that each route implies a particular place in the topology. The set created by this union is very different both in size and character from the set created by the union of all reachable destinations, because each route is a unique "how do I get there from *here*" instead of a unique "there". If the authors could make that point with a hammer, this phrase might not go the way of "global routing table" as a term of art. |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total … [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total available in the address field, used to define the network prefix. I hate to nit-pick definitions in a terminology documents, but I had to read this over and over before I could make this mean what I think they mean. I take it they mean the network prefix length describes the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field; the placement of "total available" in the above makes that hard to infer. Would "The network prefix length contains the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field" make sense as a replacement? NIT: DUT is first expanded as "Cevice Under Test" |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total … [Ballot comment] Section 2.2 has this definition: Definition: The network prefix length is the number of bits out of the total available in the address field, used to define the network prefix. I hate to nit-pick definitions in a terminology documents, but I had to read this over and over before I could make this mean what I think they mean. I take it they mean the network prefix length describes the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field; the placement of "total available" in the above makes that hard to infer. Would "The network prefix length contains the number of bits used by the network prefix out of the total available in the address field" make sense as a replacement? |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot comment] Should there be terminology for prefix filtering? |
|
2004-03-29
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Kessens |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | David Kessens | Ballot has been issued by David Kessens |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | David Kessens | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | David Kessens | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Expert Review::External Party by David Kessens |
|
2004-03-25
|
06 | David Kessens | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 by David Kessens |
|
2004-03-24
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | Shepherding AD has been changed to David Kessens from Bert Wijnen |
|
2004-01-02
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | New AD (Bert) is checking with WG chairs |
|
2004-01-02
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | Shepherding AD has been changed to Bert Wijnen from Randy Bush |
|
2004-01-02
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2004-01-02 from |
|
2003-08-14
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to Expert Review::External Party from AD Evaluation::External Party by Randy Bush |
|
2003-08-14
|
06 | Randy Bush | WG chairs submit for Info. I ask routing and ops dirs for feedback. |
|
2003-07-03
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-05.txt |
|
2003-04-07
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to AD Evaluation :: External Party from AD Evaluation :: AD Followup by Bush, Randy |
|
2003-03-14
|
06 | Randy Bush | tossed back to zinin and ops-dir for review |
|
2003-03-14
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to AD Evaluation :: AD Followup from AD Evaluation :: Revised ID Needed by Bush, Randy |
|
2003-03-07
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-04.txt |
|
2002-11-04
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to AD Evaluation :: Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation :: External Party by Bush, Randy |
|
2002-08-13
|
06 | Randy Bush | zinin found many undefined refs and inappropriate text.<br>back to authors with note to wg. |
|
2002-08-13
|
06 | Randy Bush | responsible has been changed to Author from Responsible AD |
|
2002-08-13
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author) from AD Evaluation … State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author) from AD Evaluation by randy |
|
2002-07-30
|
06 | Randy Bush | responsible has been changed to Responsible AD from Area Directors |
|
2002-07-30
|
06 | Randy Bush | Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None |
|
2002-07-30
|
06 | Randy Bush | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Pre AD … State Changes to AD Evaluation from Pre AD Evaluation by randy |
|
2002-07-30
|
06 | Randy Bush | wg hands to randy for iesg processing<br>randy asks alex to take a look too |
|
2002-07-30
|
06 | Randy Bush | Draft Added by randy |
|
2002-07-29
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-03.txt |
|
2002-07-02
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-02.txt |
|
2002-03-05
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-01.txt |
|
2001-07-16
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt |