Skip to main content

IPv4 Multihoming Practices and Limitations
RFC 4116

Yes

(David Kessens)

No Objection

(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

David Kessens Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2005-01-20)
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART (who had already reviewed it at WG Last Call)

Essence of his review:

I think its ready to be approved as an informational document
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2005-01-20)
  In the security considerations, the author points to the "Threats
  relating to IPv6 multi-homing solutions," which is good, but I
  think that this document should also state the implications of
  the potential solutions on IP security (IPsec).  IPsec is
  discussed very briefly in section 6.3.3, but this is not the only
  place concerns arise.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()