IPv4 Multihoming Practices and Limitations
RFC 4116

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(David Kessens) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

Comment (2005-01-20)
No email
send info
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART (who had already reviewed it at WG Last Call)

Essence of his review:

I think its ready to be approved as an informational document

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2005-01-20)
No email
send info
  In the security considerations, the author points to the "Threats
  relating to IPv6 multi-homing solutions," which is good, but I
  think that this document should also state the implications of
  the potential solutions on IP security (IPsec).  IPsec is
  discussed very briefly in section 6.3.3, but this is not the only
  place concerns arise.

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection