Skip to main content

Architecture Taxonomy for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP)
RFC 4118

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-10-13)
Reviewed by Joel Halpern, Gen-ART

His review:

This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC,

nit: While I understand that one needs terminology to understand some
of the description, it is usually better (and I believe it would be
better for this document) to introduce the topic of discussion before
giving the terminology and related items.  I.e. Much of section 2
belongs before section 1.
nit: There is a trailing symbol at the end
of section 5.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2004-10-13)
  In section 4.8.1: s/transferred /securely transferred/

  The document contains some non-ASCII characters.

  Reference [5] needs to be updated to point to the approved standard.

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-10-07)
References need to be split normative/informative.

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-10-12)
[this is close to a DISCUSS, since the document seems to be self-contradictory]

1.4 says that a "Fat Access Point" can be referred to a a WTP.  It says the same for "Thin Access Point".  In other words, WTP can refer to both concepts.  Since one of the document is to clarify terminology (and in particular to disambiguate the phrase "Access Point"), this seems odd.

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()