The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)
RFC 4120

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2005-07-19
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-07-19
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4120' added by Amy Vezza
2005-07-15
07 (System) RFC published
2004-10-18
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-10-15
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-10-15
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-10-15
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-10-15
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-10-14
2004-10-14
07 Russ Housley Note field has been cleared by Russ Housley
2004-10-14
07 Russ Housley State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2004-10-13
07 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-10-13
07 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Joel Halpern, Gen-ART

His review:

As far as I can tell, this draft is ready for publication as a
Propsoed Standard ...
2004-10-13
07 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-10-11
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-09-30
07 Russ Housley State Change Notice email list have been change to <jhutz+@cmu.edu> from <deengert@anl.gov>
2004-09-30
07 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-10-14 by Russ Housley
2004-09-30
07 Russ Housley [Note]: 'On IESG Telechat agenda to see if the new version clears the remaining DISCUSS ballots.' added by Russ Housley
2004-09-07
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-07.txt
2004-07-23
07 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very impressed with this document -- it's an impressive effort to clarify a very large, very complex, ancient spec.

7.1  ...
2004-07-23
07 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very impressed with this document -- it's an impressive effort to clarify a very large, very complex, ancient spec.

7.1  ...
2004-07-12
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-06-30
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-06-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-06.txt
2004-02-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-05.txt
2003-12-05
07 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
None of the protocol constants are maintained by IANA? This seems like
a disaster waiting to happen. Recommendation: start effort to create
an ...
2003-12-05
07 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Thomas Narten
2003-12-04
07 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Amy Vezza
2003-12-04
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-12-04
07 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very impressed with this document -- it's an impressive effort to clarify a very large, very complex, ancient spec.

meta-note:  ...
2003-12-04
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-04
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot comment]
Reference to RFC2273 must be changed to RFC3413
2273 has been obsoleted for MANY MANY years already
2003-12-04
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for  by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-04
07 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Alex Zinin
2003-12-04
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Jon Peterson
2003-12-04
07 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Bill Fenner
2003-12-04
07 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-04
07 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
I don't like endnotes.
Given the prevalence of [5] in the ASN.1 notation, it's even extraordinarily hard to figure out ...
2003-12-04
07 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Harald Alvestrand
2003-12-03
07 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
In adding mandatory TCP transport (beyond 1510),
a length field preceding the messages is added,
with the high bit reserved as zero to ...
2003-12-03
07 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Allison Mankin
2003-12-03
07 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
meta-note:  should we permit end-notes in RFCs?

3.2.2  Authenticators MAY NOT be re-used
        and *SHOULD* be ...
2003-12-03
07 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.1

---> KDCs are SHOULD honor this flag.

The "are" looks spurious.

Section 1.2

The text uses "canonicalize" in a ...
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6.1 says:

  Names that fall into the other category MUST begin with a prefix that
  contains no equal (=) or ...
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6.1 says:

  Names that fall into the other category MUST begin with a prefix that
  contains no equal (=) or ...
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Ted Hardie
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.1

---> KDCs are SHOULD honor this flag.

The "are" looks spurious.

Section 1.2

The text uses "canonicalize" in a ...
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.1

---> KDCs are SHOULD honor this flag.

The "are" looks spurious.

Section 1.2

The text uses "canonicalize" in a ...
2003-12-02
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for  by Ted Hardie
2003-11-18
07 Ned Freed
[Ballot comment]
No objection, but a bunch of nits:

Really small stuff:

  References not split into normative and informative groups
  MUST/SHOULD/etc ...
2003-11-18
07 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Ned Freed
2003-11-12
07 Russ Housley
Shifted from 2003-11-20 telechat agenda to 2003-12-04 telechat agenda to allow the authors to make a number of editorial changes.  No technical changes are ...
2003-11-12
07 Russ Housley Telechat date was changed to 2003-12-04 from 2003-11-20 by Russ Housley
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Russ Housley
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley Status date has been changed to 2003-11-09 from 2003-07-07
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2003-11-09
07 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2003-11-04
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2003-10-21
07 Michael Lee Last call sent
2003-10-21
07 Michael Lee State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee
2003-10-21
07 Michael Lee Last Call was requested by Michael Lee
2003-10-21
07 Michael Lee State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Michael Lee
2003-10-21
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-21
07 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-21
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-07-22
07 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Housley, Russ
2003-07-07
07 Russ Housley Draft Added by Housley, Russ
2003-06-19
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-04.txt
2003-03-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-03.txt
2002-11-04
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-02.txt
2002-09-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-01.txt
2002-02-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00.txt