Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
RFC 4205
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 19 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection
The Security considerations and IANA considerations are placed a little strangely compared to the "contributors" and "acknowledgements" sections. I also found the security consideration: Mechanisms to secure ISIS Link State PDUs and/or the TE TLVs can be used to secure the GMPLS TE TLVs as well. a little light, since it did not have a pointer to where those are defined or a list of what they are