Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) Q.921-User Adaptation Layer
RFC 4233

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
02 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document defines a protocol for backhauling of Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) Q.921 User messages ...
2015-10-14
02 (System) Notify list changed from <lyong@ciena.com> to (None)
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-01-10
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2006-01-10
02 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4233' added by Amy Vezza
2006-01-09
02 (System) RFC published
2005-05-09
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-05-05
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-05-05
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-05-05
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-05-05
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2005-02-24
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-02-23
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-02-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3057bis-02.txt
2004-10-15
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-10-14
02 Thomas Narten [Ballot discuss]
IANA considerations needs work; placeholder for more detailed comments to follow...
2004-10-14
02 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-10-14
02 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART

Her review:

Summary:
--------
Draft should be ready for publishing as a proposed standard
with the correction of ...
2004-10-14
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-10-14
02 Michelle Cotton
IANA Review Comments -  We see the registration of  IUA "1" in the SCTP Payload Protocol Identifiers registry found at
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/sctp-parameters>
Will we ...
2004-10-14
02 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-10-13
02 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-10-13
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for IUA
  is 9900.

It's an accident of (former) IANA practices that IUA ...
2004-10-13
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
In these
  cases, the SCTP functions above MAY NOT be a requirement and TCP can
  be used as the underlying common ...
2004-10-13
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
The bit quoted below is infelicitous (as an IETF adept and native to English , I can parse this
MAY NOT, but it ...
2004-10-13
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
The bit quoted below is infelicitous (as an IETF adept and native to English , I can parse this
MAY NOT, but it ...
2004-10-13
02 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-10-13
02 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-10-12
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Amy Vezza
2004-10-12
02 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-10-12
02 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
The Heading and the Abstract need to reflect the fact that this document
  obsoletes RFC 3057.
2004-10-12
02 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
The optional INFO String parameter can carry any meaningful 8-bit
  ASCII character string along with the message.  Length of the INFO
  ...
2004-10-12
02 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-10-11
02 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Heading and the Abstract need to reflect the fact that this document
  obsoletes RFC 3057.

  Please add a subsection to ...
2004-10-11
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-10-11
02 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-10-10
02 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-10-06
02 Jon Peterson Telechat date was changed to 2004-10-14 from  by Jon Peterson
2004-10-06
02 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-10-14 by Jon Peterson
2004-10-06
02 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2004-10-06
02 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2004-10-06
02 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2004-09-23
02 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-09-09
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-09-09
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-09-09
02 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2004-09-09
02 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jon Peterson
2004-09-09
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-09-09
02 (System) Last call text was added
2004-09-09
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-07-14
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-07-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3057bis-01.txt
2004-07-12
02 Jon Peterson Draft was submitted, but didn't end up in the repository - requested resubmission.
2004-05-21
02 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2004-05-21
02 Jon Peterson Need to add a "changes from RFC3057" section.
2003-10-20
02 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2003-08-15
02 Jon Peterson Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2003-07-28
02 Jon Peterson Draft Added by Peterson, Jon
2003-05-15
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3057bis-00.txt