Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
RFC 4288

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Scott Hollenbeck) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2005-07-27)
No email
send info
Email from Scott about a phone call with Ned and John on 7/25.  They have an 05 that includes a 
cleanup of the steps to make it clearer, text that I'd seen, but also that makes the ietf-types
review MUST for both stds and ietf, as I requested.  This was not accepted in our original
several email dialogs in May, though Scott reports that this is not recalled by the author as
such :(

I've removed my Discuss in favor of Scott watching the draft till the revision comes out after
IETF 63.

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection