Skip to main content

Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension
RFC 4315

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from mrc@cac.washington.edu to (None)
2005-12-27
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-12-27
04 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4315' added by Amy Vezza
2005-12-21
04 (System) RFC published
2005-07-30
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-07-25
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-07-25
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-07-25
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-07-22
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-07-22
04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21
2005-07-21
04 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by IESG Secretary
2005-07-21
04 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-07-21
04 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-07-21
04 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-07-21
04 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-07-21
04 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2005-07-21
04 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-07-21
04 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-07-20
04 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-07-20
04 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-07-15
04 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
I'm not going to block this, but I really expected to find a description
of the changes compared to 2359.

Related nit: 2539 …
[Ballot comment]
I'm not going to block this, but I really expected to find a description
of the changes compared to 2359.

Related nit: 2539 is listed in the references, but not cited.
2005-07-15
04 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-07-12
04 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck
2005-07-12
04 Scott Hollenbeck Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-07-12
04 Scott Hollenbeck Created "Approve" ballot
2005-07-12
04 Scott Hollenbeck Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-07-12
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-07-04
04 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2005-06-15
04 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:
According to the IANA Considerations section, upon approval of this document the IANA will update the reference for the UIDPLUS capability …
IANA Last Call Comments:
According to the IANA Considerations section, upon approval of this document the IANA will update the reference for the UIDPLUS capability in the
imap4-capabilities registry, replacing RFC2359.  We understand this to be the only IANA Action.
2005-06-06
04 Michael Lee Last call sent
2005-06-06
04 Michael Lee State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee
2005-06-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck Last Call was requested by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-06-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-06-06
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-06-06
04 (System) Last call text was added
2005-06-06
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-06-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck
AD evaluation comments:

Please run the text through a spell checker.  I noticed at least one error (Security COnsiderations, "issused").

Security Considerations: it might be …
AD evaluation comments:

Please run the text through a spell checker.  I noticed at least one error (Security COnsiderations, "issused").

Security Considerations: it might be helpful to explain why the SHOULD NOT recommendation is given.

The reference to RFC 2234 could be replaced with a reference to draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis.

IDNits output:

idnits 1.72

tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt:

tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(22): Line is too long: the offending characters are 's'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(36): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'C'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(37): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'n'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(92): Line is too long: the offending characters are 't'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(93): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'f'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(98): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'd'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(100): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'd'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(106): Line is too long: the offending characters are ','
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(122): Line is too long: the offending characters are 't'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(128): Line is too long: the offending characters are 's'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(175): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'e'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(234): Line is too long: the offending characters are '.'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(237): Line is too long: the offending characters are '1'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(273): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'n'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(282): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'e'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(302): Line is too long: the offending characters are '-'
tmp/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt(305): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'l'


  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html :

    Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate...
    the boilerplate looks good.
    No nits found.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt :

  - The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was 1
    longer page, the longest (page 1) being 408 lines

  Miscellaneous warnings:

    None.

    No nits found.
2005-06-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-06-06
04 Scott Hollenbeck Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state Publication Requested
2005-05-26
04 (System) New version available: draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt
2005-05-25
03 (System) New version available: draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-03.txt
2005-05-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-02.txt
2005-05-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-01.txt
2005-05-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-00.txt