A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package and Data Format for Various Settings in Support for the Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PoC) Service
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Allison Mankin) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Comment (2005-08-28 for -)
From Joel Halpern (Gen-ART review): As a minor question, the document definition (both the description and the schema) permit a document with no entity elements. This causes me to wonder why this is permitted, when it would occur, and what a receiver should do with such a document?
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
Section 5.7 says: > > It is RECOMMENDED that the signature be by an authority over the > domain of the user. > I suggest: > > The NOTIFY SHOULD be signed by an authority over the domain of > the user. Section 5.7 says that the NOTIFY ought to be signed by "an authority over the domain of the user." What in the certificate of the signer indicates that they are an authority over the domain? This is not a DISCUSS comment because RFC 3856 includes the same problem. I believe that the working group needs to address this problem. Without an answer to this question, ad-hoc mechanisms will be developed to determine whether or not a particular certificate is associated with "an authority over the domain of the user."