A Transport Network View of the Link Management Protocol (LMP)
RFC 4394
Yes
No Objection
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
It is pretty late in the document before the reader learns which ITU-T Recommendations make up the "the ITU-T discovery work." I think this should be defined in the front of the document.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Record
This draft illustrates a major terminology confusion that we have between the IETF and the ITU-T. We use "transport" to mean Layer 4 transport protocols and issues. They use "transport" to mean, well, I don't know for sure, but it seems to mean "moving bits." I believe this terminology clash needs to be explained right at the beginning of this draft - even its title fooled me. Extreme example: in this draft, TCP means Termination Connection Point