Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes
RFC 4395
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
Typo noted by Spencer Dawkins > Eek! This is a typo. The second 'provisional' should be 'permanent'. > It's trying to say that IANA should do what the Expert > recommends. > > >>I had reviewed version 05 of this draft and chatted with the authors on a >>couple of points, so "no objection to publication as a BCP", >>but there's one incoherent part, at the top of page 10: >> >> 5. If Expert Review recommends registration 'provisional' or >> 'provisional' registration, IANA adds the registration to the >> appropriate registry.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Can reference [14] be deleted?
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) Recuse