Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 17 and is now closed.
(Mark Townsley) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Quite a few typos, e.g. Time Dividion Multiplexed and two errors in the first line quoted below. (From review by Spencer Dawkins) One question on page 22 - in this sentence, As mentioned above, as MPLS enabled network, should not accept MPLS packets from its external interfaces (i.e. interfaces to CE devices or to other providers' networks) unless the top label of the packet was legitimately distributed to the system from which the packet is being received. Should "should not" be SHOULD NOT? (and is there ever a reasonable justification for accepting them)?
(Margaret Cullen) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck) (was Discuss) No Objection
(David Kessens) No Objection
(Allison Mankin) No Objection
(Jon Peterson) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen) No Objection
(Alex Zinin) No Objection
The doc has been reviewed in the MPLS WG and folks are happy with answers.