Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
RFC 4447
Yes
(Mark Townsley)
No Objection
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 17 and is now closed.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-07-21)
Unknown
The doc has been reviewed in the MPLS WG and folks are happy with answers.
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-07-19)
Unknown
Quite a few typos, e.g. Time Dividion Multiplexed and two errors in the first line quoted below. (From review by Spencer Dawkins) One question on page 22 - in this sentence, As mentioned above, as MPLS enabled network, should not accept MPLS packets from its external interfaces (i.e. interfaces to CE devices or to other providers' networks) unless the top label of the packet was legitimately distributed to the system from which the packet is being received. Should "should not" be SHOULD NOT? (and is there ever a reasonable justification for accepting them)?
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown