Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
RFC 4447
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 17 and is now closed.
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
The doc has been reviewed in the MPLS WG and folks are happy with answers.
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
Quite a few typos, e.g. Time Dividion Multiplexed and two errors in the first line quoted below. (From review by Spencer Dawkins) One question on page 22 - in this sentence, As mentioned above, as MPLS enabled network, should not accept MPLS packets from its external interfaces (i.e. interfaces to CE devices or to other providers' networks) unless the top label of the packet was legitimately distributed to the system from which the packet is being received. Should "should not" be SHOULD NOT? (and is there ever a reasonable justification for accepting them)?
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection