Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Specification Errata and Issues
RFC 4460

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

Comment (2005-12-13)
No email
send info
I'd recommend removing this from the abstract:

  Because some text is changed several times the last delta in the text
   is the one which should be applied.

The write-up and document make clear that this document will inform the creation of
a -bis document, but that statement in the abstract looks to be instructions for creating
a bis from this document.  Given the discussion summarized in the write-up, that seems
like something worth changing or removing.  I'd suggest that the following:

   Note that when reading this document one must use care to assure that
   a field or item is not updated further on within the document.  Each
   section should be applied in sequence to the original RFC2960 [7]
   since this document is a historical record of the sequential changes
   that have been found necessary at various inter-op events and through
   discussion on the list.

may need revision along the same lines.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection