References from rfc4461
This is an experimental product. These dependencies are extracted using heuristics looking for strings with particular prefixes. Notably, this means that references to I-Ds by title only are not reflected here. If it's really important, please inspect the documents' references sections directly.
| Document | Title | Status | Type | Downref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCP 14 |
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels Refs Ref'd by |
Best Current Practice | normatively references | |
| BCP 78 |
Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust Refs Ref'd by |
Best Current Practice | informatively references | |
| RFC 2119 |
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels Refs Ref'd by |
Best Current Practice | normatively references | |
| RFC 2702 |
Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS Refs Ref'd by |
Informational | normatively references | |
| RFC 3031 |
Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture Refs Ref'd by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 3209 |
RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels Refs Ref'd by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 3468 |
The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group decision on MPLS signaling protocols Refs Ref'd by |
Informational | informatively references | |
| RFC 3473 |
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions Refs Ref'd by |
Proposed Standard | informatively references | |
| RFC 3564 |
Requirements for Support of Differentiated Services-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering Refs Ref'd by |
Informational | informatively references | |
| RFC 4090 |
Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels Refs Ref'd by |
Proposed Standard | informatively references |