Collected Extensions to IMAP4 ABNF
RFC 4466

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Scott Hollenbeck) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

Comment (2006-01-27)
No email
send info
Editorial nits from Gen-ART review by Elwyn Davies:

Abstract/s1: I guess we ought to expand ABNF on first occurrence (instead of at
the start of s3) and give the [ABNF] reference in s1.

s2.5, next to last para: s/Each modified is an/Each modifier is an/

s2.7: s/This document hasn't specified any semantical change/This document does
not specify any semantic change/
s2.7: s/got extended/had already been extended/

s3, comment to definition of append-ext: s/define/defines/

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection