Collected Extensions to IMAP4 ABNF
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
(Scott Hollenbeck) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Editorial nits from Gen-ART review by Elwyn Davies: Abstract/s1: I guess we ought to expand ABNF on first occurrence (instead of at the start of s3) and give the [ABNF] reference in s1. s2.5, next to last para: s/Each modified is an/Each modifier is an/ s2.7: s/This document hasn't specified any semantical change/This document does not specify any semantic change/ s2.7: s/got extended/had already been extended/ s3, comment to definition of append-ext: s/define/defines/