Minimally Covering NSEC Records and DNSSEC On-line Signing
RFC 4470
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Margaret Cullen) Yes
(Allison Mankin) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Comment (2005-12-13 for -)
No email
send info
send info
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) No Objection
Comment (2005-12-14 for -)
No email
send info
send info
I would have preferred that the online signing document talk about alternative approaches to solving the problem particularly to the extent that there is active work going on on these approaches. However that's not a discuss.
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
Comment (2005-12-14 for -)
No email
send info
send info
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing: As currently written, Section 4 is probably not appropriate for a Standards Track document.
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2005-12-14)
No email
send info
send info
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing: Section 2: s/wsa signed./was signed./ Section 5: s/public key signatures/digital signatures/