Derivation of DNS Name Predecessor and Successor
RFC 4471

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Margaret Cullen) Yes

(Allison Mankin) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

Comment (2005-12-14)
No email
send info
I would have preferred that the online signing document talk about
alternative approaches to solving the problem particularly to the
extent that there is active work going on on these approaches.  However that's not a discuss.

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

Comment (2005-12-14)
No email
send info
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing: As currently written, Section 4 is probably not appropriate for a Standards Track document.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2005-12-14)
No email
send info
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing:
    Section 2: s/wsa signed./was signed./
    Section 5: s/public key signatures/digital signatures/

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection