Skip to main content

CIPID: Contact Information for the Presence Information Data Format
RFC 4482

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from  rjsparks@nostrum.com, hisham.khartabil@telio.no to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Scott Hollenbeck
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-07-13
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2006-07-13
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4482' added by Amy Vezza
2006-07-03
07 (System) RFC published
2006-01-03
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-12-23
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-12-23
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-12-23
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-12-22
07 Ted Hardie State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ted Hardie
2005-12-21
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-12-21
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-07.txt
2005-12-02
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-12-01
2005-12-01
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-12-01
07 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-12-01
07 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-12-01
07 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2005-12-01
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-12-01
07 Brian Carpenter [Ballot comment]
I am assuming changes agreed between Henning and Spencer Dawkins
following Gen-ART review will be incorporated.

See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/draft/cipid/draft-ietf-simple-cipid-07.txt
2005-12-01
07 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-12-01
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2005-11-30
07 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-11-30
07 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-11-30
07 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-11-30
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-11-30
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-11-28
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
When the PKIX WG developed RFC 3709, it was important that the
  content referenced by a URI did not change from …
[Ballot discuss]
When the PKIX WG developed RFC 3709, it was important that the
  content referenced by a URI did not change from the time that the
  URI was provided to the time that the URI was referenced.  Thus,
  the certificate extension includes two items, the URI and a hash
  of the content.  It is not clear to me whether there is a similar
  integrity concern in this context or not.  If it is a concern, no
  mechanism is available to detect the content change.  If it is not
  a very big concern, then the consequences of content change ought
  to be discussed in the security considerations.
2005-11-28
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-11-28
07 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot discuss]
The W3C XML Schema specs need to be added as normative references.

I think there needs to be some discussion of internationalization issues …
[Ballot discuss]
The W3C XML Schema specs need to be added as normative references.

I think there needs to be some discussion of internationalization issues in this document, particularly as they relate to the display-name element and IRIs.  I could be wrong, though, so let's discuss ahead of the telechat if at all possible.
2005-11-28
07 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ted Hardie
2005-11-28
07 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot discuss]
I think there needs to be some discussion of internationalization issues in this document, particularly as they relate to the display-name element and …
[Ballot discuss]
I think there needs to be some discussion of internationalization issues in this document, particularly as they relate to the display-name element and IRIs.  I could be wrong, though, so let's discuss ahead of the telechat if at all possible.
2005-11-28
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-11-25
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2005-11-22
07 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-12-01 by Ted Hardie
2005-11-22
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2005-11-22
07 Ted Hardie Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie
2005-11-22
07 Ted Hardie Created "Approve" ballot
2005-11-02
07 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will register 1 XML Namespace and 1 XML Schema at the following registries:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ns.html …
IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will register 1 XML Namespace and 1 XML Schema at the following registries:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ns.html
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema.html
2005-11-01
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-11-01
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-11-01
07 Ted Hardie Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie
2005-11-01
07 Ted Hardie State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie
2005-11-01
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-11-01
07 (System) Last call text was added
2005-11-01
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-10-31
07 Ted Hardie
This is the PROTO writeup for the submission of:
draft-ietf-simple-cipid-06

1. The chairs have reviewed this version of the ID and
  ask that the …
This is the PROTO writeup for the submission of:
draft-ietf-simple-cipid-06

1. The chairs have reviewed this version of the ID and
  ask that the IESG consider it for publication.

2. This document has been sufficiently reviewed by the
  working group. The community of interest is smaller
  than that for RPID, but still sufficient for substantive
  review.

3. The chairs do not believe further cross-area review
  is needed. Scott Hollenbeck participated in the XML
  specific engineering done in the later part of this
  documents development.

4. This document is part of a family of related documents
  (rpid, cipid, future). The consensus building process
  led to separate documents. There is pressure from a
  few working group members (notably Rohan Mahy) to
  recombine them. The WG prefers not to combine the drafts
  based on two primary concerns
      1 - Implementations can implement rpid without
          implementing cipid or future
      2 - It will be difficult to complete the combining
          editing process without reopening issues

5. This document reflects the active participation of a
  slightly smaller set of the working group than most, but
  the working group as a whole understands the document's
  contents and agrees to request its publication.

6. There have been no indications of intent to appeal.

7. This document adheres to ID-nits.

8. The document appropriately splits references into
  Informative/Normative.

9. Announcement Writeup

Technical Summary

This document utilizes the extention mechanisms within the
Presence Information Document Format (PIDF) adding optional
elements with additional information about the presentity
and its contacts.

This extension focuses on providing "business card" like
information in a presence document, including a card element
that can hold a vCard, a display name, a URI for a homepage,
a URI for an icon representing the presentity, a URI for
a map related to the presentity, and a URI for a sound
related to the entity.

Working Group Summary

  This document reflects WG consensus. It is related to, and was
  split out from, the Rich Presence Information Document format
  (RPID) work to facilitate building consensus. 

Protocol Quality

  Robert Sparks was the PROTO shepherd for this document.
2005-10-31
07 Dinara Suleymanova State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Dinara Suleymanova
2005-10-31
07 Dinara Suleymanova Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2005-08-04
07 Ted Hardie Draft Added by Ted Hardie in state AD is watching
2005-07-18
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-06.txt
2005-06-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-05.txt
2005-06-03
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-04.txt
2004-07-14
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-03.txt
2004-07-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-02.txt
2004-03-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-01.txt
2004-02-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-simple-cipid-00.txt