Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement
RFC 4487

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Margaret Cullen) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

Comment (2006-02-16)
I think the abstract is too long.

Section 5 shoud probably point out that the issues can be decoupled.
In particular, it is not necessary to consider the case when both the
MN and CN are behind a firewall because doing so presents no new
issues that are not in the decoupled exploration.

Overall I found the document clear and well written.