Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement
RFC 4487
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
I think the abstract is too long. Section 5 shoud probably point out that the issues can be decoupled. In particular, it is not necessary to consider the case when both the MN and CN are behind a firewall because doing so presents no new issues that are not in the decoupled exploration. Overall I found the document clear and well written.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection