A Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Extension for the Reduction of Bandwidth of a Reservation Flow
RFC 4495
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
At the end of section 1, it states: This document is intended to be classified as an 'update' to RFC 2205 [1], as this mechanism affects the behaviors of the ResvErr and ResvTear indications defined in that document. And I think it would be good to state that in the abstract as well.
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Please change "IPSec" to "IPsec."
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection