Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator
RFC 4516
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
Authors will ask IANA to reference this spec, to address Discuss. The host-skipping /// (see old Discuss) is* documented ok in the spec - several of us missed the flow on it.
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection
Reviewed by Scott Brim, Gen-ART, at Last Call time. His review: No objection. I didn't spend a lot of time on it (short attention span), but it looks like they did the cutting and pasting right and I saw no conceptual issues. It would be nice if the Security Considerations section were more informative, for the sake of implementers, but it's good enough to pass.
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
IANA has reserved the "ldaps" scheme. Should it be discussed in this document? Please remove section 12 prior to publication as an RFC.
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection