Considerations for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Extensions
RFC 4521
Yes
(Ted Hardie)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Mark Townsley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2006-01-18)
Kurt is nothing if not complete; very well done
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-17)
Possible replacement for paragraph 2 of section 3.1.1, after debate between the author and Gen-ART reviewer Elwyn Davies: Specifications detailing controls extending the Bind operation SHALL detail that the Bind negotiated security layers do not protect the information contained in these controls and SHALL detail how the information in these controls is to be protected or why the information does not need protection. (and analogous update in section 3.1.2)
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-16)
s/IPSEC/IPsec/
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()