Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) "Who am I?" Operation
RFC 4532
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21
|
10 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag) |
2015-10-14
|
10 | (System) | Notify list changed from to (None) |
2006-06-13
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
2006-06-13
|
10 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 4532' added by Amy Vezza |
2006-06-08
|
10 | (System) | RFC published |
2005-01-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-12-31
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-12-31
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-12-31
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-12-29
|
10 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ted Hardie |
2004-11-19
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-10.txt |
2004-11-17
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-11-18 by Amy Vezza |
2004-11-11
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-11-18 by Ted Hardie |
2004-11-11
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Note]: 'On Agenda to confirm that Russ''s discuss can clear' added by Ted Hardie |
2004-11-11
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Discussed updates with Kurt at IETF 61; need to reconfirm that this handles Russ'es objection |
2004-06-08
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Note field has been cleared by Ted Hardie |
2004-06-08
|
10 | Ted Hardie | sent to russ for check |
2004-06-08
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-09.txt |
2004-03-19
|
10 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by … [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which they are transferred as part of. NEW: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which includes them. In section 3, please add the following sentence to the last paragraph (which ends with "a multi-stage Bind operation"): NEW: Where a request is received in violation of this absolute prohibition, the server should respond with an operationsError result code' added by Amy Vezza |
2004-03-17
|
10 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot comment] Section 2.2: "u:kurt@OPENLDAP.ORG" is provided as an example. EXAMPLE.ORG (or another example described in RFC 2606) should be used instead … [Ballot comment] Section 2.2: "u:kurt@OPENLDAP.ORG" is provided as an example. EXAMPLE.ORG (or another example described in RFC 2606) should be used instead of OPENLDAP.ORG. Section 6: s/This OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.3 to identify/OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.3 is used to identify/ |
2004-03-17
|
10 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Amy Vezza |
2004-03-15
|
10 | Harald Alvestrand | [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by … [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which they are transferred as part of. NEW: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which includes them. In section 3, please add the following sentence to the last paragraph (which ends with "a multi-stage Bind operation"): NEW: Where a request is received in violation of this absolute prohibition, the server should respond with an operationsError result code' added by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-03-15
|
10 | Harald Alvestrand | A number of editorial issues found by John Loughney, GEN-ART reviewer. I believe these do not warrant holding up approving the document, but they might … A number of editorial issues found by John Loughney, GEN-ART reviewer. I believe these do not warrant holding up approving the document, but they might be "nice to fix if document is revved for other reasons". Serious, requires a re-write: ============================= 1) Section 3, 2nd sentence: .... If the server is treating the client as an anonymous entity, the response field is present but empty. -> Define what empty is, all zeros - or something else? 2) Section 5, security considerations: Identities associated with users may be sensitive information. -> I woulk imagine these authorized identities are sensitive information, so that the next sentence: ..... When so, security layers [RFC2829][RFC2830] should be established to protect this information. -> The 'should' in the above sentence needs to be 'MUST.' Editorial: ========== 1) Title: LDAP "Who am I?" Operation - want to expand LDAP. 2) Broilerplate, etc. needs updating (obviously!). 3) Abstract contains the exact same text as the 1st paragraph of section 1. Either re-write the abstract, or delete the repeated paragraph in section 1. 4) Abstract talks about 'the authorized identity' and this terms is used several times before it is defined in 4th paragraph of section 1. An earlier defination (perhaps in the abstract) would be nice. 5) Section 3, paragrph 3: If the server is unwilling or unable to provide the authorization identity it associates with the client, the server SHALL return a whoami Response with an appropriate non-success resultCode ... -> a reference to where these resultCodes are defined is needed. 6) Needs IPR text. |
2004-02-19
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-03-18 by Amy Vezza |
2004-02-19
|
10 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by … [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which they are transferred as part of. NEW: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which includes them. In section 3, please add the following sentence to the last paragraph (which ends with "a multi-stage Bind operation"): NEW: Where a request is received in violation of this absolute prohibition, the server should respond with an operationsError result code' added by Amy Vezza |
2004-02-16
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established … [Note]: 'Proposed RFC Editor Note: RFC Editor note: In section 1, please replace: OLD: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which they are transferred as part of. NEW: Bind controls are not protected by the security layers established by the Bind operation which includes them. In section 3, please add the following sentence to the last paragraph (which ends with "a multi-stage Bind operation"): NEW: Where a request is received in violation of this absolute prohibition, the server should respond with an operationsError result code' added by Ted Hardie |
2004-02-12
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-02-19 by Ted Hardie |
2004-02-12
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Author will provide a revised ID or RFC editor note to handle DISCUSS comments. |
2003-08-21
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2003-08-21
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-08-21 by Amy Vezza |
2003-08-20
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-08-21 by Amy Vezza |
2003-08-19
|
10 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Ted Hardie |
2003-08-19
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Since the write-up has been written and the ballot sent, the previous state was wrong. |
2003-08-18
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie |
2003-08-18
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie |
2003-08-18
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Created "Approve" ballot |
2003-08-18
|
10 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2003-08-18
|
10 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2003-08-18
|
10 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-08-15
|
10 | Michael Lee | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-08-21 by Michael Lee |
2003-08-15
|
10 | Michael Lee | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup from IESG Evaluation by Michael Lee |
2003-08-15
|
10 | Michael Lee | Ballot writeup needed to be placed on agenda for telechat 2003-8-21 |
2003-08-12
|
10 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Ted Hardie |
2003-08-12
|
10 | Ted Hardie | The intent here is to put this on the same ballot as the auth response document and gauge whether the IESG believes an IESG note … The intent here is to put this on the same ballot as the auth response document and gauge whether the IESG believes an IESG note pointing to the authzid mechanism is needed in the auth response document or if the status difference is enough. |
2003-08-12
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-08-21 by Ted Hardie |
2003-06-12
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Status date has been changed to 2003-07-08 from |
2003-06-12
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Publication Requested by Vezza, Amy |
2003-06-10
|
10 | (System) | Last call sent |
2003-03-24
|
10 | Ted Hardie | Shepherding AD has been changed to Hardie, Ted from Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-18
|
10 | Patrik Fältström | Draft Added by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-04
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-08.txt |
2002-08-05
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-07.txt |
2002-05-17
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-06.txt |
2002-05-02
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-05.txt |
2002-04-30
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-04.txt |
2002-04-24
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-03.txt |
2002-03-06
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-02.txt |
2002-01-07
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-01.txt |
2001-11-14
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-00.txt |